Assertion-Based Approaches to Auditing Complex Elections, with Application to Party-List Proportional Elections
نویسندگان
چکیده
Risk-limiting audits (RLAs), an ingredient in evidence-based elections, are increasingly common. They a rigorous statistical means of ensuring that electoral results correct, usually without having to perform expensive full recount -- at the cost some controlled probability error. A recently developed approach for conducting RLAs, SHANGRLA, provides flexible framework can encompass wide variety social choice functions and audit strategies. Its flexibility comes from reducing sufficient conditions outcomes be correct canonical `assertions' have simple mathematical form. Assertions been auditing various including plurality, multi-winner super-majority, Hamiltonian methods, instant runoff voting. However, there is no systematic building assertions. Here, we show assertions with linear dependence on transformations votes easily transformed form SHANGRLA. We illustrate by constructing party-list elections such as free list using D'Hondt method, expanding set which SHANGRLA applies directly.
منابع مشابه
Efficiently Auditing Multi-Level Elections
In a multi-level election, voters are divided into groups, an election is held within each group, and some deterministic procedure is used to combine the group results to determine the overall election result. Examples of multi-level elections include U.S. presidential elections and some parliamentary elections (such as those with regional groupings of voters). The results of such an election c...
متن کاملBayesian Inference on Proportional Elections
Polls for majoritarian voting systems usually show estimates of the percentage of votes for each candidate. However, proportional vote systems do not necessarily guarantee the candidate with the most percentage of votes will be elected. Thus, traditional methods used in majoritarian elections cannot be applied on proportional elections. In this context, the purpose of this paper was to perform ...
متن کاملA Bayesian Method for Auditing Elections
We propose an approach to post-election auditing based on Bayesian principles, and give experimental evidence for its efficiency and effectiveness. We call such an audit a “Bayes audit”. It aims to control the probability of miscertification (certifying a wrong election outcome). The miscertification probability is computed using a Bayesian model based on information gathered by the audit so fa...
متن کاملModeling Party Competition in General Elections
Popular elections are the central political act of democracies, and citizens in all advanced democracies organize their political competition through parties that compete in general elections. While political historians have studied parties for many years, it is remarkable that only in the last decade or so have there been serious attempts at abstract conceptualizations—that is, formal models—o...
متن کاملCrashing the Party? Elites, Outsiders, and Elections∗
We study an elections model in which political parties are internally divided between an “elite” and a “base” whose preferences are imperfectly aligned. Elites are better informed about the quality of potential nominees, and their endorsements can identify and promote high quality candidates. However, elites may also choose to restrict their endorsements to candidates who adopt their preferred ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1611-3349', '0302-9743']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_4